首页> 外文OA文献 >Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: The role of long-term and working memory
【2h】

Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: The role of long-term and working memory

机译:句子回忆中的自动和受控处理:长期和工作记忆的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Immediate serial recall is better for sentences than word lists presumably because of the additional support that meaningful material receives from long-term memory. This may occur automatically, without the involvement of attention, or may require additional attentionally demanding processing. For example, the episodic buffer model (Baddeley, 2000) proposes that the executive component of working memory plays a crucial role in the formation of links between different representational formats and previously unrelated concepts. This controlled integrative encoding may be more important in sentence than word recall. Three experiments examined the effect of an attention-demanding concurrent visual choice reaction time task on the recall of auditorily presented stories, sentences, and lists of unrelated words, in order to investigate the relative importance of automatic and controlled processing for these materials. The concurrent task was found to disrupt the recall of strings of unrelated sentences more than random word lists, suggesting that controlled processing played a greater role in the sentence recall task. On subsequent learning trials, however, recall of the unrelated words was also disrupted by the concurrent task, possibly due to the development of chunking. The large dual task decrement for unrelated sentences did not generalise to the recall of more naturalistic prose, suggesting that the requirement to integrate phonological with long-term linguistic information is not attentionally demanding per se; instead, the integration of unrelated concepts is effortful once recall extends beyond the capacity of the phonological loop. Our results suggest that sentence recall reflects contributions from both automatic linguistic processes and attentionally limited working memory. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:对于句子,立即连续回忆比单词列表更好,大概是因为有意义的材料从长期记忆中获得了额外的支持。这可能会自动发生,而不会引起注意,或者可能需要进行额外的注意处理。例如,情节缓冲模型(Baddeley,2000)提出,工作记忆的执行部分在不同表示形式与先前不相关的概念之间的链接形成中起着至关重要的作用。在句子中,这种受控的集成编码可能比单词回忆更重要。为了调查自动和可控处理这些材料的相对重要性,三个实验检查了注意力集中的并发视觉选择反应时间任务对听觉呈现的故事,句子和无关单词列表的回忆的影响。发现并发任务比随机单词列表更能干扰无关句子的字符串的回忆,这表明受控处理在句子回忆任务中的作用更大。然而,在随后的学习试验中,并发任务也中断了无关单词的记忆,这可能是由于分块的发展。对无关句子的双重双重任务减量并未推广到更自然主义的散文的回忆,这表明将语音学与长期语言信息相结合的要求本身并没有引起人们的注意;取而代之的是,一旦召回范围超出语音循环的能力,不相关概念的整合就很容易进行。我们的结果表明,句子的回忆反映了自动语言过程和注意力有限的工作记忆的贡献。 ©2004 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号